Legal Opinion

Watson v. Manning

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 7, 1916No. 6599PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error from District Court, Okfuskee County; John Caruthers, Judge. Acting by I. H. Manning against Tom Watson. Execution on a judgment for plaintiff was levied on property claimed by defendant as a homestead, and defendant’s objections to a confirmation of a sale were overruled, as well as his motion for new trial, and he brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

COLLIER, C.

On the 22nd day of May, 1913, judgment was recovered by defendant in error against plaintiff in error in the district court of Okfuskee county. On the 4th day of October, 1913, execution was issued out of said court upon said judgment, and said execution was levied upon the following described pr.operty in the town of Boley, to wit:

“All that portion of lot eight (8) in block numbered one hundred and fifty-four (154), described as follows: Commencing at the northwest corner of said lot, running thence south along the west line, of said lot 25 feet to the southwest corner…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ashton v. IngleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1878
  2. Maloney v. HeferCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Andrews v. HagadonTexas Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Clausen v. SandersSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1903

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Kerns v. WardenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  2. Greenwood v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  3. Storm v. GarnettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  4. Preston v. Ottawa County Nat. BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  5. Bouse v. StoneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API