In re Paulette B.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Family Court properly terminated respondent’s parental rights upon the basis of clear and convincing evidence that, despite petitioner’s “diligent efforts to encourage and strengthen the parental relationship”, respondent failed to plan for the future of the children (Social Services Law § 384-b [7] [a]). Although the court failed to comply with CPLR 4213 (b) by making specific findings of fact with respect to the fulfillment of petitioner’s statutory obligation (see, Matter of Kelly G., 244 AD2d 709), the record is sufficiently developed…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In re Charlene TT.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- In re Kelly G.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- In re Jeremy KK.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- In re Michael BB.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Robare v. Plattsburgh Publishing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In re Markus R.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- B., TIMOTHY, MTR. OFAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- In re Chanel C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- In re Chanel C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- In re Timothy B.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.