Legal Opinion

Andrews v. Crump

District Court, W.D. North Carolina

Decided October 16, 1996No. 5:94CV101-McKPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

MeKNIGHT, United States Magistrate Judge.

THIS MATTER comes before the undersigned United States magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) to consider Defendants’ motion for summary judgment as to Plaintiffs’ claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and state law. Having carefully considered all submissions of the parties, including transcripts, affidavits, briefs, and eases cited, the undersigned concludes, for the following reasons, that Defendants are entitled to qualified immunity, and to summary judgment on that ground, as to Plaintiffs’ Section 1983 claims, which are the…

2Cases cited60 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Andrews v. CrumpCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  2. Farwell v. City of JacksonvilleDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2021
  3. Oxford Capital Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
  4. Oxford Capital Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
  5. Trident Steel Corporation v. SiffinDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API