Legal Opinion

Matlock v. Matlock

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1914PublishedCited by 12 opinions

From Lane: Lawrence T. Harris, Judge. This is a suit by J. D. Matlock against Mary F. Mat-lock for a divorce. From a decree in favor of defendant on a cross-complaint, plaintiff appeals. Department 2.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McNary

This is a suit to dissolve a marriage contract. Plaintiff initiated the proceedings, assigning as a reason, cruel and inhuman treatment on the part of the defendant. The attack of plaintiff was met by an answer containing general denials and a cross-complaint alleging inhuman conduct by plaintiff. The parties intermarried at the City of Eugene April 30, 1912, plaintiff then being 73 and defendant 54 years of age. They lived together about 9% months. The record of their brief matrimonial venture is crowded with alternating sunshine and shadow, and a recapitulation thereof would serve no…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Beckley v. BeckleyOregon Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Jones v. JonesOregon Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Adams v. AdamsOregon Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hengen v. HengenOregon Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Crumbley v. CrumbleyOregon Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Carmichael v. CarmichaelOregon Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Hawley v. HawleyOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Matlock v. MatlockOregon Supreme Court · 1917

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API