Legal Opinion
State v. Cutler
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided July 19, 1976No. File No. CR 3-19517PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
On June 28, 1976, the court heard the following three motions in the above case: (1) an amended motion to preserve and disclose court records; (2) an amended motion for the disclosure of court records; and (3) an objection to the disclosure of court records. To put this court's decision into full perspective, it is necessary to state the history of the incident relating to those motions.
On May 8, 1973, Clarence Marsella, a security agent of The Southern New England Telephone Company, hereinafter referred to as SNET, complained to the Danbury police that toll fraud was being committed through…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Powers v. Hotel Bond Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1915
- McGann v. AllenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
- Bridgeman v. City of DerbySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
- See v. GosselinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
- Lechner v. HolmbergSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Golino v. City of New HavenDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1991
- State v. AnonymousConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- State v. AnonymousConnecticut Superior Court · 1979
- State v. Anonymous (1983-1)Connecticut Superior Court · 1983