Legal Opinion

Hare v. Young

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided January 20, 1915PublishedCited by 7 opinions

APPEAL from the District Court of the Sixth Judicial District, in and for .the County of Bingham. Hon. J. M. Stevens, Judge. Suit to foreclose chattel mortgage. Judgment for plaintiffs. This registration act provides that the lease “must be filed of record in the same county recorder’s office or offices and within the same time and manner and.for the same fee, as are chattel mortgages.”

Read the full summary

APPEAL from the District Court of the Sixth Judicial District, in and for .the County of Bingham. Hon. J. M. Stevens, Judge. Suit to foreclose chattel mortgage. Judgment for plaintiffs. This registration act provides that the lease “must be filed of record in the same county recorder’s office or offices and within the same time and manner and.for the same fee, as are chattel mortgages.” There is no statutory provision for filing foreign chattel mortgages when the chattels are subsequently brought into this state. The chattel mortgage registration acts apply only to property in the state of…

1Opinion of the Court

MORGAN, J-

This ease was tried in the district court immediately following the trial of that just decided by this court, in which the safiip parties appellant and respondent appeared, and in which case foreclosure of a mortgage made by W. R. Young in favor of the\Auderson Brothers Bank was involved. (See ante, p. 682, 146 P&c. 104.)

In this case it was stipulated that the testimony of the witnesses John O. Jones, An dr ¿^Anderson, J. B. Larson, W. R. Young and W. A. Lee given oh behalf of the defendants in the ease involving the Anderson Brothers bank mortgage and all exhibits introduced on…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Courtright v. DeedsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1873
  2. Rea v. WilsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
  3. Marchand v. RonaghanIdaho Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Trevorrow v. TrevorrowMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Goodwin v. GarrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re Odberg's EstateIdaho Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Swanstrom v. Bell.Idaho Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Bingenheimer Mercantile Co. v. SackNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Stoddard v. PloegerIdaho Supreme Court · 1926
  5. IDC Enterprises, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API