Legal Opinion

Swanstrom v. Bell.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided November 19, 1947No. 7339PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GIVENS, Justice.

Plaintiff-respondent sued defendant-appellant in replevin for the possession or recovery of the alleged ($1283.00) value of certain described livestock and farm machinery.

Appellant counterclaimed, contending the bill of sale under which respondent sought possession, was intended to be a mortgage and respondent had only the right to foreclose.

Respondent’s version of the underlying transaction was that he purchased the property from appellant, paying therefor by liquidating certain outstanding indebtedness of appellant, including a note and mortgage due one Mr. Kitts. Appellant…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Schlieff v. BistlineIdaho Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Wright v. RosebaughIdaho Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Dickens v. HestonIdaho Supreme Court · 1933
  4. American Fruit Growers, Inc. v. WalmstadIdaho Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Smith v. Washburn-Wilson Seed Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1925

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Bethlahmy v. BechtelIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Anderson v. WhippleIdaho Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Boesiger v. FreerIdaho Supreme Court · 1963
  4. State v. JacksonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1960
  5. Stivers v. Sidney Mining Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1949

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API