Legal Opinion

Nationwide Insurance v. Patterson

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided December 23, 1991No. 91-1522PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

SLOVITER, Chief Judge.

This appeal by Nationwide Insurance Company of Columbus, Ohio is from the dismissal of its action seeking a declaratory judgment that the insured, appellee Marcie *45Patterson, was not entitled to benefits under the underinsured coverage of an insurance policy issued by Nationwide. The district court granted Patterson’s motion to dismiss under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(h) on the ground that the parties were obliged to arbitrate the dispute as to whether underin-sured coverage is owed to Patterson.

It is not disputed that Marcie Patterson was struck and injured by…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Williamson v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
  3. United Services Automobile Ass'n AppealSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Robert G. Boyle v. The Governor's Veterans Outreach & Assistance CenterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
  5. Brennan v. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Nationwide Insurance Company of Columbus, Ohio v. Marcie Patterson. Marcie Patterson, Counter-Claimant v. Nationwide Insurance Company of Columbus, Ohio, Counter-Defendant, Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company of Columbus, OhioCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API