Cargill, Inc. v. United States
District Court, E.D. Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
WEBER, District Judge.
Plaintiffs are barge line operators. They commenced this action on November 16, 1959; against the United States of America and the Interstate Commerce Commission seeking an injunction of the Commission’s Fourth Section order No. 19059, entered January 9, 1959, and for a declaratory judgment. They are in competition with various railroads which can be classified into two groups: one, the eastern group which has trunk lines from Chicago, Illinois, to the east and with proportional or re-shipping rates for long hauls and, two, the western group which has lines serving west…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mills v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- United States v. Alaska Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Local No. 8-6, Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers International Union v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Amalgamated Ass'n of Street, Electric Railway & Motor Coach Employees of America, Division 998 v. Wisconsin Employment Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Amarillo-Borger Express, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1956
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- A. L. Mechling Barge Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Carl Brandenfels v. J. Edward Day, Postmaster GeneralCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963
- A. L. Mechling Barge Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Vivian Tankships Corp. v. CastroDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1998