Legal Opinion
State v. Hartshorn
Idaho Court of Appeals
Decided March 8, 2010No. 33914, 33915, 33916, 33917PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WALTERS, Judge Pro Tem.
Curtis Glenn Hartshorn appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion to withdraw a guilty plea. In addition, Harts-horn appeals from the district court’s orders denying his motions under Idaho Criminal Rule 35 for reduction of his sentences. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.
i.
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
Pursuant to a plea agreement, Hartshorn pled guilty to possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver. I.C. § 37-2732(a)(1)(A). Hartshorn was sentenced to a unified term of ten years, with a minimum period of confinement of three years. The…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Pennsylvania v. FinleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- State v. LopezIdaho Court of Appeals · 1984
- State v. HuffmanIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Jensen v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
- Larry Wade v. State of TennesseeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2018
- William M. Phillips v. State of Tennessee - concurringCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2018
- William M. Phillips v. State of Tennessee - concurring in part and dissenting in partCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2018