Legal Opinion

Arnson v. Abrahamson

New York Court of Common Pleas

Decided April 7, 1890PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from fourth district court. Action by Paula Arnson against Wolf Gekowsky and Max Abrahamson and Nathan Storm. The two last-named defendants appeal from the judgment entered in favor of plaintiff.

1Opinion of the CourtLarremore, C. J.

This ivas an action brought upon a promissory note against the defendant Gekowsky, the maker, and the defendants Max Abrahamson and Nathan Storm, two indorsers upon the note. It was insisted as a defense that the note was a forgery, upon which an issue was framed and tried, and a verdict rendered in favor of the defendant. The indorsers claimed 'that they were discharged from liability on account of said alleged forgery.

It is a well-settled legal principle that an indorser impliedly warrants that the instrument is not forged; and, if it is, he is liable upon this warranty. He cannot question…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. National Park Bank v. . Ninth National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  2. Bank of Commerce v. . Union BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1850
  3. Grant v. EllicottNew York Supreme Court · 1831
  4. Coggill v. . the American Exchange BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1847
  5. Shaver v. EhleNew York Supreme Court · 1819

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Beall v. General Electric Co.New York Supreme Court · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API