Legal Opinion
Beall v. General Electric Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 15, 1896Published
The nature of the action and the facts, so far as they are ¡material, are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtGiegerich, J.
This action, is brought against the General Electric Company of Yucatan, Marcus Nathan, Horace H. Thayer and August H. Schumacher, upon the following promissory note:
“ $2,400. New York, August 24, 1893.
One hundred and twenty days after date we promise to pay to the Order of Marcus Nathan twenty-four hundred dollars, with interest for sixty days at 6 per cent, per annum, at N. Y. Produce . Exchange Bank. The General Electric Co. of Yucatan, H. H. Thayer, treas.; A. Schumacher, president. ' Value received. No., 8. Due Dec. 22-26, 1893.
“Indorsements: Marcus Nathan, A. Schumacher, H. H. Thayer;.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Grant v. EllicottNew York Supreme Court · 1831
- Seneca County Bank v. . NeassNew York Court of Appeals · 1850
- Mechanics' & Traders' Bank v. LivingstonNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1893
- Miller v. . TalcottNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Williams v. MatthewsNew York Supreme Court · 1824
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.