Powell v. Fugate
District Court, E.D. Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
Robert E. Wier, United States District Judge
Defendants-former jail staff and the jail itself-move for summary judgment on a former inmate's constitutional and state law claims. DE # 63. After full initial briefing, *716a reopened discovery window, and supplemental briefing, the motion stands ripe for decision. For the reasons that follow, the Court grants in part and denies in part. There are several material factual disputes. Some of Powell's claims patently fail as a matter of law, but others must go forward so that a jury may sift through the evidence and determine precisely what Powell…
2Cases cited60 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Alexander Morton v. Louisville Metro GovernmentCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2021
- Austin v. JochemDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2021
- Baldwin v. HudsonDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2020
- Cornelius v. City of Mount Washington, KentuckyDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2021
- Cox v. DraperDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2021
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.