St. John v. Garrow
Supreme Court of Alabama
Samuel fu. Johsa, jr. decís?.red in Mobile Circuit Court, against Samuel EL GLutow, as indorser of a bill of exchange. The defendant relied upon non-assrauRii, n:i;i the plea of the statute of limitations; and under these pleas, the jury found a verdict for the clofenuant.
Read the full summary
Samuel fu. Johsa, jr. decís?.red in Mobile Circuit Court, against Samuel EL GLutow, as indorser of a bill of exchange. The defendant relied upon non-assrauRii, n:i;i the plea of the statute of limitations; and under these pleas, the jury found a verdict for the clofenuant. On the trial of die cause, the plaintiff produced and read in evidence the bill of exchange, declared on, and preved protest for non-payment,, demand of acceptance, refusal, and notice to defendant; and to take the case out of the statute of limitations, he introduced a wiinm, who testified, that in repeated conversations…
1Opinion of the CourtHopkins, J.
— This was an action of assumpsit,-brought by the plaintiff against the defendant as an indorser of a bill of exchange, dravvn on the nine-' teenth day of February, eighteen hundred and twenty-five, at ten days’ sight, presented to the drawee, for acceptance, which he refused to make, on the twenty-fourth of March, in the same year, and protested for non-payment, on the sixth of April afterward.
Upon the trial of the plea of non-assumpsit in the *225Circuit Court of Mobile County, the plaintiff proved every thing that was necessary; and to support the issues which he had taken to the pleas of the…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Pearson v. DarringtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1858
- Watkins v. StevensNew York Supreme Court · 1848
- M'Gehee v. GreerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1838
- Newhouse & Co. v. RedwoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1845
- Philips v. PetersNew York Supreme Court · 1855
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.