Legal Opinion

Love v. Love

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 7, 1908No. Gen. No. 14,663PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Partition. Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Farlin Q. Ball, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the March term, 1908.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Adams

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is an appeal from an interlocutory order appointing a receiver.

The appellees, claiming to be the heirs, together with Percy W. Love, of James M. Love, who departed this life December 24,1886, leaving a will, filed a bill for the partition of certain premises described in the bill, making Percy W. Love, Thomas B. Lynd, Edward M. Lynd and others, defendants. The defendants named also claim under the will of James M. Love, deceased, which will is set out in full in the bill.

The question which claim is valid, that of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Elgin Lumber Co. v. LangmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1887
  2. Deimel v. BrownAppellate Court of Illinois · 1890
  3. Railton v. PeopleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1899

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Munson v. FishburnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Scholz v. BarbeeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1951
  3. McDougall Co. v. WoodsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1928
  4. Mayer v. CollinsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1931
  5. Friedman v. PeeklerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API