Legal Opinion

Kay v. Kay

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 18, 1932PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMerrell, J.

This action was brought by the plaintiff husband against the defendant, his wife, for an absolute divorce because of misconduct and adultery committed by defendant with one Clarence E. Clanny. The answer of the defendant denied the allegations of the complaint that she was guilty of adultery with Clanny on September 28, 1930, at 10 Columbia avenue, Palisade Park, in the State of New Jersey. Upon the pleadings the following issue was framed: “ Did the defendant commit adultery with one, Clare Clanny, at Palisade Park, New Jersey, on the 28th day of September, 1930? ” The said issue was tried…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Roth v. RothAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
  2. Rathje v. RathjeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
  3. Roth v. . RothNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
  4. Davidson v. DavidsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fleck v. FleckNew York Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Salomon v. SalomonNew York Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Freidberg v. FreidbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960
  4. Golann v. GolannAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946
  5. Westervelt v. WesterveltNew York Court of Appeals · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API