Legal Opinion · Dissent

Westervelt v. Westervelt

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 5, 1970Published

1Dissent

Jasen, J. (dissenting).

I agree with the dissenting Justices at the Appellate Division that the judgment of the trial court denying the plaintiff a divorce from the defendant on the ground of adultery should be reversed, as a matter of law.

*867To establish adultery by circumstantial evidence, the plaintiff need only show a lascivious desire and the opportunity to gratify it. (Kay v. Kay, 235 App. Div. 25.) The court, considering the circumstances as a whole, must be convinced that the parties’ acts are more consistent with guilt than innocence and cannot refuse to give the circumstances their…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Moller v. . MollerNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Kay v. KayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API