De Bakey v. Prater
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1DissentElliott, Judge
Owners of contiguous estates have a right, as a matter of law, Civil Code, art. 823 et seq., to have their boundary limits fixed and recognized when none exists. In this case such a necessity exists, hut the judgment appealed from rejects plaintiff’s demand without recognizing and fixing any boundary limits between the parties, leaving the situation as it existed before the suit was filed, which was in itself an error.
The case, McCahill v. Wood, 4 La. App. 621, cited by the plaintiff, is not applicable to the present case. The opinion in the McCahill Case states -that the defendants urged the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Opdenwyer v. BrownSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
- Harang v. Golden Ranch Land & Drainage Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1918
- Williams v. BernsteinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1899
- Sibley v. PiersonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1909
- Vicksburg, Shreveport & Pacific Railway Co. v. LeRosenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1899
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.