Legal Opinion

Sonoma Magnesite Co. v. National Magnesite Products Corp.

California Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 1922No. S. F. No. 10261PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, C. J.

Defendant moves this court to dismiss this appeal on the ground that the judgment was entered by consent of the parties, that the sale was made by the consent of the parties, and upon the further ground that the agreement of January 17, 1922, between Chloupek, as at torney for plaintiff, and the National Magnesite Products Corporation, estops plaintiff from appealing from the judgment herein.

Since notice of the motion. was filed, the appellant and the respondent have each filed additional papers and, among other things, the transcript on appeal has been filed, wherefrom it clearly appears…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Estate of WunderleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Wadsworth v. Santaquin CityUtah Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Stern & Goodman Investment Co. v. DanzigerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Scarpel v. East Bay Street Railways, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1940
  5. Pacific States Savings & Loan Co. v. MortimerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API