Legal Opinion

Vigilant Insurance v. Bear Stearns Companies

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 13, 2008PublishedCited by 88 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Graffeo, J.

In this insurance dispute, we conclude that the insured breached a policy provision obligating it to obtain the consent of its liability carriers before settling claims in excess of $5 million. We therefore reverse the order of the Appellate Division denying the insurers’ motion for summary judgment.

Defendant Bear Stearns Companies, Inc., a financial services firm, was issued a primary professional liability insurance policy by plaintiff Vigilant Insurance Company that provided coverage for losses resulting from claims made against the insured for its wrongful…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. White v. Continental Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 2007

3Cited by88 opinions

  1. The Burlington Insurance Company v. NYC Transit AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 2017
  2. Universal American Corp. v. National Union Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 2015
  3. Lend Lease (US) Construction LMB Inc. v. Zurich American Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 2017
  4. Gilbane Bldg. Co. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co.Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 2018
  5. Starr Indem. & Liab. Co. v. Brightstar Corp.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019

83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API