Legal Opinion
Churchill v. Russey
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided June 26, 1985No. 2-84-251-CVPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOPKINS, Justice.
This appeal is brought from the granting of an injunction prohibiting appellants from foreclosing on a vendor’s lien and permitting the record titleholder to redeem the note.
We affirm.
On November 19, 1970, appellee Russey received a judgment against Jack Cobb for about $16,000 plus attorney’s fees and interest from the date of judgment in the 141st District Court of Tarrant County. An abstract of judgment was filed but no execution issued.
On August 14, 1979, Russey filed an action in the 153rd District Court of Tar-rant County to foreclose the 1970 judgment lien and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Benson v. Greenville Nat. Exchange BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
- Berry Bros. v. Nelson Davis & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1890
- Penny v. KelleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Uvalde Const. Co. v. LawrenceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
- Wallace v. BriersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
3Cited by5 opinions
- Gildea v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.Utah Supreme Court · 2015
- Penner v. Brints (In Re Brints)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 1998
- Hoxie Implement Co., Inc. v. Baker, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2001
- Hoxie Implement Co., Inc. v. Baker, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2001
- Hoxie Implement Company, Inc. v. Jim Baker, Individually and Dba Baker Harvesting, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2001