Legal Opinion

Uvalde Const. Co. v. Lawrence

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 21, 1936No. 12198PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOONEY, Justice.

The city of Dallas instituted this suit on a paving certificate issued to the Uvalde Paving Company, for $2,340, purportedly the pro rata part of the cost of paving 267 feet on the east side of Lattimer street in said city. The certificate is payable, one-half by Joe Z- Lawrence, and one-eighth each by Julia Florence Galloway, Lida Mae Lytel, J. B. Galloway, and Annie Galloway Riggs (the Galloway heirs), in accordance with their reputed interests in the abutting property. Plaintiff sought judgment for the pro rata part due by each, together with foreclosure of the assessment…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hill v. HoeldtkeTexas Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Scanlan v. Gulf Bitulithic Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1932
  3. Uvalde Rock Asphalt Co. v. LyonsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  4. Weimhold v. HydeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  5. City of Mexia v. MontgomeryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gause v. GauseCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
  2. Churchill v. RusseyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1985
  3. Graham v. New Mexico Eastern Gas Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API