Legal Opinion
Cody v. Caterisano
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided January 13, 2011No. 09-2166PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by published opinion. Senior Judge BALDOCK wrote the opinion, in which Chief Judge TRAXLER and Judge WILKINSON joined.
OPINION
BALDOCK, Senior Circuit Judge:
Petitioner Andrew Peter Cody asks us to reverse the district court’s denial of his petition for attorneys’ fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(a), because the Government’s position was not substantially justified or, in the alternative, to remand for the district court to explain its rationale for denying the petition. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm.
I
The facts in this case are…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Service v. JeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. PangilinanSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Berenyi v. District Director, Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Great Steaks, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. 515 Granby, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
- Maurice Meyer, III v. Carolyn ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014
- Nesari v. TaylorDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2011
- Addison v. United States Department of Agriculture (In re Addison)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Virginia · 2015
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.