Legal Opinion

Kohler v. North Star Steel Co., Inc.

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided August 11, 2005No. Civ. 03-60281Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

BATTANI, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Before the Court is Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. # 30). Defendant contends that Plaintiffs cannot establish a prima facie case of disability discrimination under the ADA, or intentional interference with plaintiff Bruce Kohler’s (“Kohler”) rights under ERISA. Defendant points to a number of reasons: (1) Plaintiffs cannot show that Kohler is a qualified individual with a disability under the ADA; (2) Plaintiffs cannot demonstrate any connection between attainment of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Hunt v. CromartieSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API