Legal Opinion
Decker Coal Co. v. Hartman
District Court, D. Montana
Decided February 28, 1989No. CV 87-304-BLG-JFBPublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
BATTIN, Chief Judge.
Presently pending before the Court is plaintiffs Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. For the reasons stated below, plaintiffs motion is granted.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Plaintiff filed this action on December 3, 1987, seeking a declaratory ruling that Mont.Code Ann. § 39-51-2305(3) is unconstitutional, as preempted by the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 151 et seq. (NLRA). The subsection in question allows a striking worker, ordinarily disqualified from receiving unemployment benefits under § 39-51-2305(1), to receive benefits…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Middlesex County Ethics Committee v. Garden State Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Garner v. Teamsters, Chauffeurs & Helpers Local Union No. 776Supreme Court of the United States · 1954
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Sussman v. Salem, Saxon & Nielsen, P.A.District Court, M.D. Florida · 1994
- Taylor Woodrow Construction Corp. v. Sarasota/Manatee Airport AuthorityDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1993
- Jacob v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2000
- Daly v. HarrisDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2002
- Painting Industry of Hawaii Market Recovery Fund v. United States Department of the Air ForceDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1990
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.