Legal Opinion

Suren v. Oceanic S. S. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 17, 1936No. 7894PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

The libel herein was filed November 16, 1934, under the general maritime law to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by the libelant on June 24, 1932, when he was a seaman aboard the steamship Monterey, due to the falling of a port hole frame upon the hand and wrist of the appellant, The appellant alleged that the injury resulted from the unseaworthiness of the ship, in that the eyebolt designed to hold the port hole frame was worn and weakened and carried away in consequence.

In order to avoid the claim of laches due to the delay of over two years in filing the libel, which…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Freshman v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. The Marianna FloraSupreme Court of the United States · 1826
  3. The Charles MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  4. Munson S. S. Line v. Glasgow Nav. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1916
  5. Wilson v. Calculagraph Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1907

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Funk v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
  2. Svenson v. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1937
  3. Fletcher v. Evening Star Newspaper Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
  4. Latta v. Western Inv. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
  5. Richfield Oil Corporation, a Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API