Legal Opinion

Anderson v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 29, 1946No. 23369Published

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

GRAVES, Judge.

Appellant again complains because the affidavit and information herein are signed by the criminal district attorney, claiming that the statute creating such office for McLennan County is void, and that there is no such officer known to the law. This contention was answered in our original opinion with the proposition that if such statute is void (which we do not hold), then such criminal district attorney was a de facto officer. We are again then offered by appellant the proposition that there can be no de facto officer unless there be a de jure office,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Irwin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1944
  2. Hill County v. SheppardTexas Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Adamson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API