Legal Opinion

Praprotnik v. City of St. Louis

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided June 21, 1989No. Nos. 85-1145, 85-1267 and 85-1268PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROSS, Senior Circuit Judge.

This case is before us after reversal and remand from the United States Supreme *1574Court. City of St. Louis v. Praprotnik, 485 U.S. 112, 108 S.Ct. 915, 99 L.Ed.2d 107 (1988). The Supreme Court, in a plurality opinion, held that this court had applied an improper legal standard for determining municipal liability, and reversed this court’s finding that the City of St. Louis was liable under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for the decisions of its subordinate city officials to transfer and later terminate James H. Praprotnik, the appellee. See Praprotnik v. City of St. Louis, 798 F.2d…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pembaur v. City of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. City of St. Louis v. PraprotnikSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Praprotnik v. City of St. LouisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
  4. City of St. Louis v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1950

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. George Mandel v. John Doe (Name Unknown, an Escambia County Prison Employee), Escambia County, FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
  2. Carr v. Town of Dewey BeachDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1990
  3. State Ex Rel. Shea v. BossolaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Winter v. Cerro Gordo County Conservation BoardCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
  5. Auriemma v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API