Legal Opinion

People v. Feerick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 4, 2004PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*268Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Bonnie G. Wittner, J.), entered on or about June 10, 2003, which denied defendants’ motions pursuant to CPL 440.10 to vacate their judgments of conviction, unanimously affirmed.

Defendants’ motions were properly denied without an evidentiary hearing since the claims could be determined on the basis of the trial record and the submissions on the motion (see People v Satterfield, 66 NY2d 796, 799 [1985]).

The People did not violate their duty to disclose exculpatory information, since the trial record clearly establishes that the People furnished, or made…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. SatterfieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. People v. VilardiNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. People v. GravesNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. People v. DoshiNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. People v. FeerickNew York Court of Appeals · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. MangarilloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  2. People v. MangarilloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API