Legal Opinion
FRIEDBERG v. COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided February 20, 2020No. 2:18-cv-01703Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA LORI FRIEDBERG, : Plaintiff, : v. ; CIVIL ACTION NO. 18-1703 ANDREW SAUL, : Commissioner of Social Security,! : —_____Defendant. ORDER Plaintiff Lori Friedberg seeks judicial review, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), of the final decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (“the Commissioner”), denying her claims for Disability Insurance Benefits (“DIB”) and Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) benefits under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act. The Court referred the case to United…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Evon HUDSON, Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITYCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- William MORALES, Appellant, v. Kenneth S. APFEL, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Podedworny v. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Schonewolf v. CallahanDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1997
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.