Grant v. State
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
HOUSER, Commissioner.
This is an appeal by Freddie Lee Grant from an adverse judgment on a motion under Criminal Rule 27.26, V.A.M.R. to vacate his 99-year sentence for rape, filed in the light of Stovall v. Denno, 388 U.S. 293, 87 S.Ct. 1967, 18 L.Ed.2d 1199, on the theory that appellant was denied due process of law in that the confrontation in this case was unnecessarily suggestive and conducive to irreparable mistaken identification. Appellant also cites United States v. Clark, D.D.C., 294 F.Supp. 44, and United States ex rel. Geralds v. Deegan, S.D.N.Y., 292 F.Supp. 968. This is the third…
Also in this document: Per curiam; Concurrence.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Loving v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- State v. GrantSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
- State v. KeeneySupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
- State v. GrantSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- State v. WileySupreme Court of Missouri · 1975
- State v. AmarilloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- State v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- State v. HamblinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1970
- State v. BrownridgeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1970
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.