Legal Opinion

State v. Rushing

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1980No. 6562PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal by the defendant Glenn Rushing who was convicted and sentenced for welfare fraud under the provisions of HRS § 346-34. HRS § 346-34 provides that:

Any person who, by means of a wilfully false statement or representation, or by impersonation or other fraudulent device, obtains or attempts to obtain, or aids or abets any other person to obtain public assistance to which he is not justly entitled, or a larger amount of assistance than that to which he is justly entitled; or any recipient who buys or disposes of real property or any person who knowingly aids or abets a recipient…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Tot v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. State v. HernandezHawaii Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State v. HopkinsHawaii Supreme Court · 1979
  4. State v. StuartHawaii Supreme Court · 1970
  5. State v. YabusakiHawaii Supreme Court · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. EastmanHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. SadinoHawaii Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State v. BaylyHawaii Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State v. Gonzalez.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2012
  5. State v. KaneHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1982

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API