Legal Opinion

Ruane v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 14, 1896PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Trespass on the Case, for personal injuries. Appeal from the Circuit Corut of Cook County; the Hon. Francis Adams, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Waterman

Appellant was employed to keep watch for the approach of all trains, to signal them to stop if necessary, and thus to guard the public and the trains of appellee. In this position he owed a duty to the public as well as to appellee. There is nothing tending to show that it was necessary for him to stand upon the track, or so near it, that he would be struck by a passing train.

Whether trains were on time, or whether they complied with statutory regulations as to ringing bells, etc., made no difference as to his duties, which were to be watchful and to give necessary warning at all times.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gibson v. LeonardIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Chicago, St. Louis & Pittsburg Railroad v. HutchinsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. CloughIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Chicago & Alton Railroad v. AdlerIllinois Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Doering v. Peoria & Pekin Union Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1915
  2. Illinois Central R. R. Co. v. CurranAppellate Court of Illinois · 1901
  3. Hines v. Pennsylvania RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1929
  4. McDoel v. HeuermannAppellate Court of Illinois · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API