Legal Opinion

Hines v. Pennsylvania Railroad

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 31, 1929Published

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Newhall

This is an appeal from the city court of East St. Louis to reverse a judgment for $20,000 in favor of appellee in an action brought by her under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, Cahill’s St. ch. 114, Ü 321 et seq., for damages on account of the death of appellee’s husband, Joseph G. Hines, while alleged to have been on duty as an employee of appellant. The declaration alleges that while appellee’s intestate was working for appellant, engaged in interstate commerce, the latter, through its servants, “without any knowledge or warning to the plaintiff’s intestate . . . carelessly,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Aerkfetz v. HumphreysSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Toledo, St. Louis & Western Railroad v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. Doering v. Peoria & Pekin Union Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1915
  4. Loettker v. Chicago City Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1909
  5. Ruane v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1896

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API