Legal Opinion

Mylander v. Beimschla

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 11, 1906PublishedCited by 7 opinions

•Appeal from the Baltimore City Court (Dobler, J.)

1Opinion of the CourtBoyd, J.

The appellee sued the appellant for “negligently permitting the waste and rain water from her property to be thrown up against and upon the north wall of the plaintiff”, thereby causing the injury set out in the declaration. The appellee relied especially upon the ground that the appellant had permitted the rain-spout, which was supposed to carry the water from the roof of her house, to become and remain in such condition that it turned the water upon the house of the appellee, injuring the wall and foundation, and causing the cellar to be damp and unhealthy. ' The appellant’s defense was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Gluck v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1895

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United Surety Co. v. SummersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1909
  2. E. H. Beck & Co. v. Hanline Bros.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1913
  3. Woodcock v. PopeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1928
  4. Gallagher v. KornblattCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1925
  5. Ackerhalt v. National Savings & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API