E. H. Beck & Co. v. Hanline Bros.
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeal from the Baltimore City Court (Hablan, C. J.). The facts axe stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.
The declaration in this case contains three counts. The first count charges that the plaintiffs occupied the premises in Baltimore City known as 23 and 25 South Howard street; that the defendant, Isaac Kaffel, owned the premises immediately adjoining on the north known as 21 South Howard street, which was occupied by the defendant, Eberhard H. Beck, trading as E. H. Beck and Company, as the tenant of the said Baffel; that the defendants, “for their own use and purposes,” brought upon their said premises water from the mains in the bed of Howard street by pipes connected with the general water…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Albert v. State ex rel. RyanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1887
- Owings v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1856
- Smith v. State Ex Rel. WalshCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1901
- Miller v. FisherCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1909
- United Electric Light & Power Co. v. State Ex Rel. LusbyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1905
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Farley v. YermanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
- Empire State Insurance Co. of Watertown v. GuerrieroCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1949
- 2310 Madison Avenue, Inc. v. Allied Bedding Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
- Commercial Realty Co. v. National Distillers Products Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Kinnier v. J. R. M. Adams, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1923
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.