Legal Opinion

Hankey v. Vanscyoc

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1930No. 19704. Reversed and remandedPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Farmer

Defendants in error, Anna and Henry O. Plankey, brought an action of trespass against plaintiff in error, William VanScyoc, and the trial resulted in a verdict and judgment in favor of the plaintiffs against defendant for one dollar. Plaintiff in error has prosecuted this appeal.

The controversy arises out of this state of facts: In 1901 plaintiff in error became the owner of the east half of the northwest quarter of section 33, township 26, in Woodford county. A former owner had more than fifty years ago planted a hedge fence along and near the west' boundary line of the eighty acres. The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jones v. ScottIllinois Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Proctor v. Town of LewistonIllinois Supreme Court · 1860
  3. New York Central Railroad v. KinsellaIllinois Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Costello v. StaubitzCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  2. Duncan v. AbellIllinois Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Marathon Oil Company v. Gail Heath and the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1966
  4. Davidson v. PerryAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008
  5. Davidson v. PerryAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API