Legal Opinion

Livestock National Bank v. Minnehaha State Bank

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1927No. File No. 6295PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtShfr'Wiooed, J.

This action is brought to recover from respondent as indorser on a certain promissory note made by Chas. W. Peterson. After issue joined the Garretson bank closed its doors and John Hirning, then superintendent of banks, was, by proper proceedings, made a party defendant. The complaint is in the usual form.

The answer alleged in substance that, if the note sued on was made by Chas. W. Peterson, it was so- made while he was an active officer, namely, vice president of respondent bank; that the loan was made directly to Peterson and was a private transaction between Peterson and appellant bank,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McPherrin v. TittleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Gold Bros. Security Co. v. Fidelity Trust Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Commercial State Bank v. IversonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Farmers' & Merchants' Bank v. NissenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Orient State Bank v. ZemlickaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dufrense v. HammerstenIdaho Supreme Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API