Legal Opinion

Cannon County v. McConnell

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1925PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKinney

When the First State Bank, of Woodbury closed its doors on August.9, 1923, there was on deposit with said bank a road fund in the sum of $25,000. The bank is hopelessly insolvent.

The question for determination is, Did this fund belong to the State of Tennessee or to the county of Cannon? If the former, it is a preferential claim, and the assets of the bank are probably sufficient to pay it in full.

The chancellor held that it belonged to the State. In so holding we are of the opinion that he committed error.

Pursuant to chapter 175 of the Acts of 1919, the county court of Cannon county entered…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People of the State of N.Y. v. . IngersollNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  2. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. RaineyTennessee Supreme Court · 1907
  3. State ex rel. Bell v. CummingsTennessee Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Demoville & Co. v. Davidson CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Maryland Casualty Co. v. McConnellTennessee Supreme Court · 1923

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Knierim v. LeatherwoodTennessee Supreme Court · 1976
  2. City of Knoxville v. GervinTennessee Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Board Comr's., San Miguel Co. v. Ppl's Bk. Tst. Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Rutherford County v. City of MurfreesboroCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1957
  5. Driver v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API