Burkland v. Starry
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
LOZIER, C.
[ 609] Plaintiffs-respondents (hereinafter called contestants) sued defendants-appellants (hereinafter called proponents) to contest the will of Mae Starrett Rayborn. The jury’s verdict upheld the will and judgment was entered accordingly. Thereafter, upon contestants’ motion, the verdict and judgment were set aside and judgment against the will was entered and, in the alternate, a new trial was granted. The sole issue is due execution.
The contested document (hereinafter called the paper or the will) was upon three sheets of paper and was entirely in Mrs. Rayborn’s own writing.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- German Evangelical Bethel Church of Concordia v. ReithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1931
- Norwood v. NorwoodSupreme Court of Missouri · 1944
- Berberet v. BerberetSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
- Heinbach v. HeinbachSupreme Court of Missouri · 1918
- Kellogg v. MurphySupreme Court of Missouri · 1942
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Clark v. City of SpringfieldMissouri Court of Appeals · 1951
- In Re Dalton EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
- Detrich v. Mercantile Trust CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
- Capps v. AdamsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
- In Re Dettling EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.