Legal Opinion

Pfalzgraf v. Ward

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 12, 1939No. 29112PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDavison, J.

This action was commenced August 30, 1935, by the plaintiff in error against the defendant in error, as defendant, to recover the penalty which section 11266, O. S. 1931, 46 Okla. Stat. Ann. § 15, provides that the holder of a real estate mortgage shall forfeit to. the mortgagor for his failure to release said mortgage upon request of the mortgagor.

At the trial the only testimony introduced was that of the plaintiff. After he had testified, the defendant demurred to the evidence. The jury was then discharged and the court took the matter under advisement, thereafter sustaining said demurrer.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Territory Ex Rel. Johnston v. WoolseySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Bullington v. LoweSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  3. Baugh v. LittleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  4. Hope v. United Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. StegallCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1953
  2. Nay v. First Financial Bank, FSBCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2003
  3. State Ex Rel. Allen v. Board of Ed., Independent School Dist. No. 74Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  4. Opinion No. (2002), Oklahoma Attorney General Reports2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API