Legal Opinion
Baugh v. Little
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 1, 1929No. 19135PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TEEHEE, C.
On June 15, 1925, plaintiff in error, R. G. Baugh, in the name of the state, .brought suit against the defendants in error.,!. F. Little, J. E. Gillian, and A. Brown, as trustees and officers of consolidated school district No. 3, Garvin county, and against said school district, to recover the sum of $1,350, this being twice amount of monies alleged to have been illegally paid out of the school funds of said school district by the trustees named as defendants, and being the penalty for which said defendant trustees, by reason of such illegal- expenditures, have become liable.
It was…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Barker v. Hannibal & St. Joseph RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1886
- Castilo v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1925
- Williams v. City of NormanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Finerty v. First Nat. Bank of DuncanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Rowe v. RichardsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- IN RE: INITIATIVE PETITION NO. 397, STATE QUESTION NO. 767Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
- IN RE: INITIATIVE PETITION NO. 397, STATE QUESTION NO. 767Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
- Dowler v. State Ex Rel. PruntySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- State Ex Rel. Mitchell v. City of ShawneeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- State of Oklahoma Ex Rel. Williams v. Oklahoma Natural Gas Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.