Legal Opinion

Choctaw Cotton Oil Co. v. Pope

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 8, 1914No. 6022PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from Superior Court, Pottawatomie County; George C. Abernathy, Judge. Action by Leslie 3- Pope against the Choctaw Cotton Oil Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtRiddle, J.

The parties will be designated herein as they appeared on the docket in the trial court. Plaintiff sued defendant in damages for the loss of his hand and injury to his hand and arm. In substance, the ground of' recovery relied upon was that defendant owned and operated a cotton seed oil mill and cotton gin in Shawnee, Okla.; that each gin stand is equipped with 70 circular-saws; that said saws are set on a line shaft about five-eighths of an inch apart; that in the operation of the gin. stands they become clogged by lint and trash accumulating between the rib plate, rendering it necessary to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1884

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Prickett v. Sulzberger & Sons Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  2. Cosden Pipe Line Co. v. BerrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  3. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. v. OwensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  4. Petroleum Iron Works Co. v. BullingtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  5. Wolverine Oil Co. v. KingsburySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API