Legal Opinion
United States v. Hall
United States Court of Military Appeals
Decided September 5, 1975No. 29,742PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Cook, Judge:
A statement made by the accused to his commanding officer while he was in confinement was used by the Government at trial in an effort to impeach him. This appeal involves consideration of the effect of that use.
The evidence indicates that before making the statement, the accused was warned of his right to remain silent under Article 31 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §831, but it does not affirmatively appear, as required, that the accused was also informed of his right to counsel at the interrogation. United States v Tempia, 16 USCMA 629, 37…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Kirby v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Milton v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. TempiaUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967
- United States v. WimberleyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1966
- United States v. WhiteUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States v. EzellUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
- United States v. RemaiUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1985
- United States v. SeayUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
- United States v. AlbaU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1983
- United States v. JohnstoneU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1978
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.