Legal Opinion

Hertzka & Knowles v. Salter

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 3, 1970No. Civ. 25972PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SIMS, J.

Plaintiff architects, as the assured under a certificate of errors and omissions insurance issued by Underwriters at Lloyd’s, London, have appealed from a judgment in favor of the underwriters in an action in which they sought to recover damages for breach of contract. The action followed tihe final determination and payment of $374,914.43, a sum in excess of the policy limits, in satisfaction of an owner’s claim for alleged breach of professional duty which had been made against the architects, and which had proceeded to arbitration at the instance of the underwriters, after…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Comunale v. Traders & General InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Crisci v. Security InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Continental Casualty Co. v. Phoenix Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1956

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Helfand v. Nationall Union Fire InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  2. Metropolitan Water District v. Imperial Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  3. Bondanza v. Peninsula Hospital & Medical CenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  4. The Southland Corporation, a Texas Corporation v. Emerald Oil Company, Etc., and Charles E. Thomas CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  5. Yamanishi v. Bleily & Collishaw, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1972

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API