Legal Opinion

Askew v. Wentworth

District Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided May 27, 2020No. 5:19-cv-00053Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY PADUCAH DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:19-CV-53-TBR-LLK MARQUITA ASKEW, PLAINTIFF v. MATTHEW WENTWORTH, DEFENDANT MEMORANDUM OPINION This matter is before the Court on Defendant Matthew Wentworth’s Motion for Summary Judgment. [DN 15]. Plaintiff Marquita Askew has not responded and the deadline to do so has passed. This matter is ripe for adjudication. For the reasons set forth herein, Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, [DN 15], is GRANTED. The Court will enter a separate Order and Judgment contemporaneous to this Memorandum…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API