Legal Opinion
Long v. Morgan
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided February 20, 2003No. 02-5548PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Elbert Phillip Long, proceeding pro se, appeals a district court order denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion for relief from judgment. This case has been referred to. a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 34(j)(l), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. RApp. P. 34(a).
In May 1989, Long’s original action was construed as a civil rights action filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Long appears to have alleged that the defendants improperly revoked his parole and that he has been illegally incarcerated from that time. In…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Kenneth M. Romstadt v. Allstate Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
- Domenico Mastini v. American Telephone and Telegraph Company and Western Electric Company, Domenico Mastini v. New York Telephone CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- Futernick v. Sumpter TownshipCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
3Cited by12 opinions
- Anagonye v. Transform Automotive LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2024
- Clower v. BrownDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2025
- Craddock v. WELLPATH LLC.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2024
- Devincet A. McFarlin, Sr. v. City of Wayne, et al.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2026
- Grimes v. Huntington National BankDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2025
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.