Legal Opinion

Rehrer v. Youst

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 29, 2014PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

BOWES, J.:

Stephanie Rehrer, individually and for the minor, B.L., appeals the order appointing a guardian ad litem to represent B.L.’s interest during pending civil litigation against Tiffany Youst, Daniel Youst, and Loving Care Agency, Inc. (“Loving Care”), collectively the Appellees. We reverse.

*185The trial court succinctly summarized the underlying facts as follows:

Plaintiff [B.L.] is a 15 year old, suffering from Global Development Delay Syndrome as well as a seizure disorder, bilateral hearing deficits, and the necessity of taking nutrients through a feeding tube. [B.L.] lives…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Harman Ex Rel. Harman v. BorahSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. Geniviva v. FriskSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. Hiller v. FauseySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. In Re DuranSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  5. Vaccone v. SykenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. City of Philadelphia v. B. Harvey and D. PenaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  2. Com. v. Cosby, L.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  3. Trust Under Will for Campbell, C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
  4. Wyse, J. v. Leone, S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API