Legal Opinion · Dissent

Weigel v. Broad

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided October 21, 2008No. 05-8094, 05-8102Published

1DissentJ. O’Brien, Circuit Judge

The majority announces a very general rule — troopers may not subject a detained person to prolonged force beyond that necessary to restrain him if a reasonable trooper would have known the applied force presented a significant danger of asphyxiation and death. It sounds remark*1156ably like generic tort law — “[N]egligenee is conduct which falls below the standard established by law for the protection of others against unreasonable risk of harm.” Restatement (Second) of Torts § 282. It leaves the details to be sorted out after the fact by a jury in an appropriate case. But an undifferentiated…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API