Weigel v. Broad
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1DissentJ. O’Brien, Circuit Judge
The majority announces a very general rule — troopers may not subject a detained person to prolonged force beyond that necessary to restrain him if a reasonable trooper would have known the applied force presented a significant danger of asphyxiation and death. It sounds remark*1156ably like generic tort law — “[N]egligenee is conduct which falls below the standard established by law for the protection of others against unreasonable risk of harm.” Restatement (Second) of Torts § 282. It leaves the details to be sorted out after the fact by a jury in an appropriate case. But an undifferentiated…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.