Legal Opinion

United States v. Steven Arthur Carr

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided June 6, 1983No. 82-8320PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FLOYD R. GIBSON, Senior Circuit Judge:

Steven Arthur Carr was convicted after a bench trial of violating 18 U.S.C. § 641 (1976) by retaining, with the intent to convert to his own use, nineteen stolen United States Series E Savings Bonds. Carr seeks reversal of his conviction, claiming that the nineteen stolen bonds he possessed were not a “thing of value of the United States” within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. § 641. We reject this claim and affirm Carr’s conviction.

I. Factual Background

The facts underlying Carr’s conviction are not in dispute. In 1968, Lena Cavett reported as stolen nineteen of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. Cecil Dwayne Evans, Arnold Gene Tate, and Charles Edward Gent, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  2. United States v. Judith Tomlinson Bullock and Roy Rodriguez, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
  3. United States v. Joseph ForcellatiCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
  4. United States v. C. Arthur McIntoshCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  5. United States v. Leon L. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. Ann W. McRee Joseph H. HaleCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
  2. United States v. Ben Renfro StuartCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  3. United States v. Paul BauerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
  4. Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports2005
  5. United States v. Ann W. McRee Joseph H. HaleCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API